PDA

View Full Version : And the media speak their mind.


slade
05-17-2005, 05:54 AM
Looks like Sony has outclassed MS in every single way. It's up to Nintendo to try and take them down now:

This one's for you TMG, from Eurogamer.net:

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=59135

Some of the hyperbole Peter Moore concocted in the Microsoft's Xbox conference tonight was nothing short of sublime. The Xbox 360 pad is, according to the ageing suit, a "gateway to gaming Zen". He actually said that. He said that Xbox 360 games will be "beyond real". How's that, Peter? Seriously, how is that?

And even though his words were the crassest of the painfully obsequious trio of himself, Allard and Bach tonight, J and Robbie both chipped in with some genuine pearlers. Allard claimed several times that Xbox 360 will be put in front of a billion "consumers" in this current generation. The global population is currently around 6.5 billion, well over a billion of which live in abject poverty. Now, J, come on. Bach claimed that Microsoft is about to turn "thought leadership into market leadership". Even through the soberest eyes, tonight was undoubtedly the night the Xbox management team upped its acid dose beyond the acceptable.

Even the setting was surreal, the Shrine auditorium near the LA Convention Center, a huge pavilion filled with many thousands of people, seething queues desperately pleading to get through iron security. Forced back up into the Gods, we were impressed by the stupid opulence of the event, as speakers poured thunderous drum and bass over the crowd. The Microsoft three took to the stage and what followed raised more than a few eyebrows. Only Allard got away with any genitalia intact.
Advertisement

After an intro from Bach, Allard was first up with his part of the Xbox 360 equation, presenting the new Live and its marriage to the machine's now well documented multi-media functionality. It's cool, no doubt. In fact, it's far beyond cool, and the concept itself in theory really could represent a revolution in the way digital media is used in general. Xbox 360 will be a storage unit for audio, video and games, the user being able to switch effortlessly between formats, and users being able to constantly contact each other by being permanently connected via broadband. The interface was lovely, and Allard managed to keep a lid on this in the main, showing a highly slick idea with a measured air. He showed how women could be brought into the gaming fold by supplying online puzzle and card games, and claimed they'd thought of every demographic and how to put them "back on the couch".

Then it got boggy. Xbox 360, he said, was going to bring games back to the mainstream, with Live free for the console in its most basic form. It wasn't convincing: imagine giving your mother an Xbox 360, a wireless router and a quick lesson in the concept of video on demand. No, us either. And a billion consumers? No, J. No, we love you and all, but that's not right. And unfortunately, it was all downhill from there.
Moore Moore Moore

Peter Moore now swanned up with all the grace of a steaming uncle at a niece's wedding. Now, we're a charitable bunch, but you have to sort Peter out, Microsoft. We're transcribing what he actually said at the moment, but to paraphrase, Xbox 360 will represent the perfect equilibrium of mind and body. Honestly. He used the word "Zen" several times. If you thought J Allard was cheesy, this guy is the ripest stilton yet conceived. He delivered what is sure to go down as an absolute classic speech in general video gaming history. And unfortunately, for both you and him, the games he demoed didn't seem to back up any of his outlandish claims.

Lost Oddysey was shown, and looked good, as you'd expect. The Project Gotham Racing 3 demo looked, well, real, although it was impossible to tell where FMV ended and real-time began. Then Ghost Recon 3. Right. Nice smoke. And NBA 2K6? This wasn't good. Rare's Kameo you've seen. Call of Duty 2; again, nice, but it's no revolution. Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion propped up the third-party RPG contingent all by itself. Gears of War was brain-crushing, full power, by far the most exciting game they showed. EA slid up on stage and showed a video of Need for Speed and Madden, among others (Robert Gallery from the Oakland Raiders). The publisher plans to have six games at launch later this year. You've seen them all before.

And that was it. Read that list again. The plan is to have between 25 and 40 games available before the end of the year, with over 160 currently in development. But considering the multimedia functionality Allard demoed was far more interesting than the actual game output, you have to be wondering if games per se are Microsoft's final objective. It really wasn't that clear.
Round peg, Square hole

Bach came back on, thankfully, to make the obvious - and well known behind the scenes - announcement that Square-Enix is making games for 360. President Yoichi Wada arrived, said everything was fine and dandy and his "games" would be coming to the machine, the first of which being Final Fantasy XI. Which is four years old.

Positive pundits will obviously say that the announcement is significant. The more cynical will say that Square merely wants to make more money and why on earth would Sony care about FFXI appearing on Live now? It means nothing, they'll say. If they'd made this announcement when they launched Live, that would have been significant, they'll say. Wada showed a real-time tech demo to pep things up a little, of an ornate pier at sunset, a dragon flying over a lake. Very pretty, but not mind-blowing.
PS free

Which is a shame, because Sony's PlayStation 3 announcement this afternoon certainly was. The machine's spec has left experts watchers stunned. Read this and this and this. Xbox 360 was on the back foot before the Microsoft conference even started, and considering what Sony showed, Microsoft's new beast suddenly looks flat, from a games sense at least. The Live stuff, as we've said, looked brilliant. But the games simply didn't give the air of being truly "next gen".

Bach rounded up saying 360 will reach "new markets across the world," not millions of users but tens of millions. "We will truly redefine what it means to have fun."

From where we were sitting, the reality isn't matching the dream. Microsoft got on stage tonight and promised nothing short of entertainment revolution, games and concept far beyond anything yet conceived. Maybe they just don't have what it takes to create what they see in their mind's eye. Maybe no one does. Or, Microsoft's worst cased scenario, maybe Sony does. Wonder what Nintendo's going to show in the morning?

And from gameindustry.biz........

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=8834
E3 Opinion: Xbox 360 is outgunned and outclassed by Sony's PS3
Rob Fahey 07:09 17/05/2005
With both Microsoft and Sony laying their cards on the table over the past week, the opening skirmish of the next-gen console war has tipped heavily in favour of the PlayStation 3 - but the war is only starting, says Rob Fahey.

There was a point, at Microsoft's pre-E3 conference four years ago, when a lot of people began to believe in Xbox. I can pinpoint the moment almost exactly - it was the point when the video of Dead or Alive 3 rolled, and the jaws of the audience slackened as the best in-game graphics they'd ever seen suddenly graced the screens ahead of them. Back when Halo was just another unproven first person shooter, a single swoop over Team Ninja's beautiful, sun-kissed beach was enough to convince many people that Xbox was worthy of attention. I know; I was one of those people.

Walking out of that conference, just a few miles from where I'm sitting now and just a few years back in time, I heard someone - an American journalist - say that Sony had been "totally, like, outclassed". He was right; the PlayStation 2 had just been given a technological kicking by its upstart rival. Not that this would stop Sony from coasting to a comfortable victory by the end of the hardware generation, of course, but the sheer graphical prowess of the Xbox really did give PS2 a bloody nose. Outclassed was the only word for it.

Today, Sony returned the favour. With interest.

Looking at the content of the two conferences today in Los Angeles - and the MTV special last week, in the case of Xbox 360 - "outclassed" is a word that comes to mind a lot. The bar which was set by Microsoft last week has not only been met, it has been vaulted over. PlayStation 3 is more powerful, more fully featured, more innovative and better supported than Xbox 360. When the Sony conference kicked off, we expected to see something "a bit better" than Xbox, technologically. We didn't expect to have our most fundamental beliefs about what next-generation games will be capable of changed. That, however, is exactly what happened.

I don't want to beat on Microsoft too hard, because ultimately there are still quite a few Xbox 360 games I'm looking forward to; but it's hard not to feel that suddenly, Microsoft's hip lingo and celebrity endorsements seem to ring very hollow. Where Microsoft gave us Elijah Wood babbling through a half hour marketing-led special on MTV, Sony had us watching Phil Harrison show off jaw-dropping interactive tech demos on stage. Harrison is about as far from being a hobbit as you can get - I'm not kidding, the man's a giant - and Ken Kutaragi is unlikely to ever have as many screaming fans as The Killers, but Sony seemed to feel that its new console spoke for itself. It didn't need celebrity endorsements, or senior executives trying to be "down with the kids" - thank god.

It's not that Sony would have problems rounding up some impressive celebs if they so desired. Sony Pictures, Sony Music and the PlayStation brand itself could have called out half of Hollywood today. Instead, we got to see a game console that feels genuinely next generation. We weren't told how "cool" a random American sports star thinks PlayStation 3 is, we were told how astonishingly powerful it is and how incredibly feature-packed it is. We're not just talking about a console that's twice as powerful as Xbox 360 in simple, logical terms (and bear in mind that that's a far, far greater gap in power than existed between PS2 and Xbox); we're talking about a console with more functionality, with fewer corners cut and with a genuinely more impressive line-up of software.

If the day could be summed up in a microcosm, it would be Square Enix' story that explained events best. Yoichi Wada, the firm's president, made two stops today. At the Sony conference, he was one of many developers presenting stunning tech demos - in his case, a truly stunning real-time recreation of the opening to Final Fantasy VII, using characters almost as high quality as those seen in the forthcoming Advent Children movie. Within a matter of hours, he had another stop to make - this time with a headline billing at the Microsoft conference, where he revealed that Square Enix will be supporting Xbox 360... With the release of a four year old massively multiplayer game that's already available on PS2 and PC.

Outclassed? Undoubtedly. Sony's hardware, its software, and even its simple display of confidence in its own product have completely outclassed Microsoft today - but while there can be little doubt about the outcome of this particular battle, it'd be a foolish man who assumed that the war was over yet. What Sony has done unto Microsoft today, Microsoft did unto Sony not so many years ago - and software giant is unlikely to take a defeat at E3 lying down. This tug of war has a long way to go yet.

Mochan
05-17-2005, 06:31 AM
Yup, that pretty much summed up my sentiments as well. The PS3 is a hell of a lot more powerful than the XBox 360, it's got more features, and it has better software support as well. Any interest I might have had for the XBox 360 suddenly disappeared. While I'm still interested in some of the stuff for the Xbox 360, like the Mistwalker stuff, all I can hope is the same stuff get ported to the PS3 eventually.

ThaMaskedGamer
05-17-2005, 07:35 AM
Is this supposed to impress me. Basically all you have said is what we already know, and what i've just stated in my own thread. Let's reiterate, Eurogamer is lambasting Allard, Moore, and Bach, i've lambasted those guys too. Go read the XBOX forum, they are doing a horrible job marketing, and they've done a horrible job in the past with the XBOX. I wrote the XBOX succeeded despite MS marketing, and it looks like the XBOX 360 will have to succeed despite MS marketing. So you aren't EVER going to see me defend the MS execs. The only thing I will say they've done wisely is really get some big name support in Japan behind the XBOX 360, but i've also said, it won't matter at all, nothing can help an American console in Japan. The only thing that could help an American console in Japan is if Nintendo packed it n and supported 360, if I were Nintendo this would be my move, but Nintendo is stupid and stubborn, in the end they are only going to embarrass themselves.

About the Square support, read my post about the Square support. First off all, I don't know if Square's games are a benefit to any console. I think this developer has definitely seen its better day. But coming to the XBOX with an old azz game is just a waste of everyone's time. The only way this can be done with any level of success is to forgo the Japanese anime graphics, do some real ad&d type graphics, make it fully playable online, it doesn't have to be MMORPG scale, but at least maybe support 6-8 players, and just make a completely bad-ass Western rpg style online rpg. Well, that isn't going to happen, so this game will meet the same fate as Silent Hill, Onimusha, and Metal Gear on XBOX. It will tank and be in the bargain bin 3 months after release.


As far as the two console. It is you hoping that "somebody takes out MS." I'm not hoping Sony falls flat on its face. I told you guys, last time around I was genuinely interested in PS2, until the Japanese launch day embarrassment followed by a year of ass games that were worse than DC games. XBOX came along and blew it out the water. This time around I'm it looks like PS3 is going to be a technical marvel. There is no reason it should not be, just like there was no reason the PS2 should have been a tech dog. Sony made boat loads of cash from PSOne and had the ability to release a great console, instead they got over on consumers, big time. Sony has always been a leader when it comes to consumer electronics, and people laud Ken Kutagari, well he got lucky MS didn't wipe the floor with him this generation with the XBOX. But this time around, it looks like he is doing what he should have done last generation. Sony has the lead, Sony has the money(at least in this department) if they want to keep their lead, they should release the baddest console out there, and spend some of that damn money for their consumers. It looks like they are doing that and i'm impressed with the machine.

Now, hopefully, the games will follow. I'm not impressed by the games like Eurogamer is so far. I don't see what games have Eurogamer so stoked. And it can't be the names. I mean all they've announced is a bunch of sequels to the standard retreads. This doesn't excite me, as you know, i'm not a big fan of the Metal Gears and Gran Tourismo's and Final Fantasy and Tekken games. I think I have doubt not in the console, but in these developers. So i'm looking forward to seeing what Ubisoft, Epic, and other western developers will do with the PS3, I don't give a rats azz about the old Sony line-up. Now, if they turn out to be great great games, lets just say i'll be happily suprised. But, judging by the comments from PolyFony, I see the developers still being the problems behind these games. PolyFony has said about the next Gran Tourismo, we would like to implement damage. That is not exactly confidence building. They need to realize, they are no longer the leader, Forza just kicked their azz, hello! So, I'm stoked about the PS3 hardware, and I think it will be a place for western developers to shine and they will push the system. Just like it was western developers that shined and pushed and continue to push the XBOX.

Now, in terms of the comparison between XBOX 360 and PS3. Developers have said XBOX 360 will be capable of producing any kind of game. Now, clearly PS3 is more powerful, but I seriously doubt this power will be so dramatic that it completely outclasses 360. They are saying PS3 is twice as powerful, yes on paper, 2 terraflops compared to 1 terraflops, but guess what, now that power has to be realized. Now it will come down to developers. But you know what, I HOPE DEVELOPERS CAN REALIZE THAT POWER. I just don't know if that power will be tangible. It will be awesome for gamers if it is. But right now, the 360 from a gaming perspective is a more than respectable contender to PS3, until proven otherwise. It could take years to do that. It definitely won't happen in 2006, no way, Bungie and Halo3 are going to be the best product out there, cause they are the most talented developers out there on the consoles right now.

The greatest thing Sony has done is announce they will have a subscription based network. As much as you guys lambasted MS for a subscription, Sony now sees this is the only way to offer value and services. Its going to take them a long time to catch up with LIVE, they may never be as good as LIVE. But hopefully it will be serviceable, and again, don't look to Japan to get the most of online gamer on PS3, that will be up to western developers. This leads back to XBOX 360, it is here and will compete for the #1 position because of its established franchises, its developers, XBOX live, and yes, its power and possibly its price. I'll be happy cause i'll have both.

ThaMaskedGamer
05-17-2005, 07:47 AM
Yup, that pretty much summed up my sentiments as well. The PS3 is a hell of a lot more powerful than the XBox 360, it's got more features, and it has better software support as well. Any interest I might have had for the XBox 360 suddenly disappeared. While I'm still interested in some of the stuff for the Xbox 360, like the Mistwalker stuff, all I can hope is the same stuff get ported to the PS3 eventually.


See I disagree with this sentiment. I think the biggest mistake for developers and consumers is to have each system duplicate games. As a person who will likely buy both consoles, I want to see unique games for each system. I want to see games maximized for one console. Now, I know this will not happen 100%, all ready Gears of War will make its way to the PS3. And of course there will be a lot of multiplatform stuff from the multiplatform kings, EA. But hopefully devs will give us a reason to own a particular system, by making the absolute best game they can for a particular system. Am I dreaming, of course I am both systems will be loaded with multiplats, but i'll only be buying the exclusives and the best for each system.

On another note, its funny, seems RARE got pissed off and pulled Perfect Dark from E-3. Apparently, they never wanted to show the game publicly at this stage, RARE knew people would prematurely judge the game. And they were right, so it looks like they've pulled a disappearing act.

Pandarbock
05-17-2005, 07:51 AM
On another note, its funny, seems RARE got pissed off and pulled Perfect Dark from E-3. Apparently, they never wanted to show the game publicly at this stage, RARE knew people would prematurely judge the game. And they were right, so it looks like they've pulled a disappearing act.

Yeah and I am sure they will probably be working on this game for yet another 4 years possibly until the release of ms's next system (heck why drag it across 3 platforms when you can do 4).

Mochan
05-17-2005, 08:00 AM
See I disagree with this sentiment. I think the biggest mistake for developers and consumers is to have each system duplicate games. As a person who will likely buy both consoles, I want to see unique games for each system.

I disagree with this sentiment. As a rational consumer, I want to buy just one console, and get all the games I want on that console. I don't want to have to spend on buying several consoles because of so many exclusives that I want to play. I dunno, even though I said I like spending on PCs, I don't have money to burn and I definitely would rather have to buy just one console.

ThaMaskedGamer
05-17-2005, 08:21 AM
I disagree with this sentiment. As a rational consumer, I want to buy just one console, and get all the games I want on that console. I don't want to have to spend on buying several consoles because of so many exclusives that I want to play. I dunno, even though I said I like spending on PCs, I don't have money to burn and I definitely would rather have to buy just one console.

Well it looks like you will definitely have your preference before I get mine. I don't think the trend of multiplats is going to go away, I think with increased budgets developers will look to as many revenue streams as possible. But in my mind, this will only lead to worse products. It won't affect me, cause I won't be buying them. I'll be buying those special games that are exclusive. Now in the case of a game like Gears of War and a lot of the other games that come out on XBOX in the first year, of course, i'll buy those, simply cause effectively they will be exclusive. But after both systems get rolling, i'm only going to buy the best of each platform.

Far as the PC angle. Seriously, I just don't see why you don't buy a PS3, or a PS3 and a 360 and be done with it. You won't have to bother with upgrading your pc any more, that's less money and frustration. And it will a long long time technically before PC games take over again. It is very possible, in a financial sense, that this could permenantly reduce the effect of pc gaming. As the cost increase and profits increase on consoles due to volume, we may never see PCs be cutting edge over consoles again, not because of tech, but simply because of economics. Sure, there will be a day 3-5 years from now, when Valve can finally make a game better on the PC, than the PS3, but will it be economically feasible for them to do so? I highly doubt it.

Just grab a console, a 1080P HD set, and chill out and enjoy. Hell, with USB, i'm sure you'll be able to get some kind of kybd/mouse support too. I know for myself, i'm done with Windows PCs, my next PC will be a MAC.

Mochan
05-17-2005, 08:52 AM
Well, I don't think the releasing games multiplatform will necessarily reduce quality. One thing that could result in would be to increase revenues for a developer, thus giving them bigger budgets to make an even better game.

Take for instance Bethesda. Bethesda released Morrowind on both PC and XBox, which resulted in them getting lots of cash, which now results in the incredibly highly-anticipated RPG, Oblivion. Which itself will be released on probably all 4 platforms, giving Bethsoft even more cash.


Regarding the PC angle, this is where your angle comes into play. There will be "exclusives" on the PC and I want them! Worse, I want to play them with a mouse, not a gamepad! Until the 360 and the PS3 give me a mouse or a similar mouse-like device to control First Person games, I will not be able to let go of the PC as a gaming device.

Oblivion, Stalker and even Boiling Point right now are the major draws for me on the PC. Oblivion though will come out on the consoles, so the real exclusive I'm after right now is Stalker.

If they will allow us to use mice as alternative inputs for these next gen consoles, then I'll be in heaven!!! When that happens I can probably finally put a nail on the coffin of my PC gaming days. But for as long as we have to use gamepads for first person games, I'll have to keep the PC around a while longer. That, and for certain kinds of strategy games as well.

I also use the PC for multimedia capabilities, and there are things that a console can't do just yet, like download bittorrent files and play DivX. (I'm a dirty pirate), as well as burn stuff. These don't require a hardware upgrade though and are irrelevant; I can use a Mac for these too if need be. It's really just the gaming concerns above.

Ultimately, I too am hoping the rise in console power will make PC hardware manufacturers wake up and not rip their consumers off with overpriced hardware! While Macs may be superior to PCs in terms of non-gaming, I am just somehow in love with PCs and all the hardware and upgrading and customizing. This is something a non-modding-enthusiast just won't understand. I practically wet myself getting a new chip and seeing how far I can clock it, or getting a shiny new copper sink and slapping it on top of a die, all the while trying to keep cooling perfectly adequate while at the same time silent.

ThaMaskedGamer
05-17-2005, 09:04 AM
Well, I don't think the releasing games multiplatform will necessarily reduce quality. One thing that could result in would be to increase revenues for a developer, thus giving them bigger budgets to make an even better game.

Take for instance Bethesda. Bethesda released Morrowind on both PC and XBox, which resulted in them getting lots of cash, which now results in the incredibly highly-anticipated RPG, Oblivion. Which itself will be released on probably all 4 platforms, giving Bethsoft even more cash.


Regarding the PC angle, this is where your angle comes into play. There will be "exclusives" on the PC and I want them! Worse, I want to play them with a mouse, not a gamepad! Until the 360 and the PS3 give me a mouse or a similar mouse-like device to control First Person games, I will not be able to let go of the PC as a gaming device.

Oblivion, Stalker and even Boiling Point right now are the major draws for me on the PC. Oblivion though will come out on the consoles, so the real exclusive I'm after right now is Stalker.

If they will allow us to use mice as alternative inputs for these next gen consoles, then I'll be in heaven!!! When that happens I can probably finally put a nail on the coffin of my PC gaming days. But for as long as we have to use gamepads for first person games, I'll have to keep the PC around a while longer. That, and for certain kinds of strategy games as well.

I also use the PC for multimedia capabilities, and there are things that a console can't do just yet, like download bittorrent files and play DivX. (I'm a dirty pirate), as well as burn stuff. These don't require a hardware upgrade though and are irrelevant; I can use a Mac for these too if need be. It's really just the gaming concerns above.

Ultimately, I too am hoping the rise in console power will make PC hardware manufacturers wake up and not rip their consumers off with overpriced hardware! While Macs may be superior to PCs in terms of non-gaming, I am just somehow in love with PCs and all the hardware and upgrading and customizing. This is something a non-modding-enthusiast just won't understand. I practically wet myself getting a new chip and seeing how far I can clock it, or getting a shiny new copper sink and slapping it on top of a die, all the while trying to keep cooling perfectly adequate while at the same time silent.


Yeah I understand, I use to be a modding enthusiast, and i've NEVER bought a commercial PC, aside from my laptop, i've built every system i've ever owned. But i'm just tired of it, and since I got involved with videoediting, music, and photos, I just wish I had of bought a MAC a few years ago. Consumer products are just so much better supported.

Far as PC games, HellGate I think its called or Hellbound, is the only game i've got my eye on right now on that front. I'm not saying there isn't anything else hot, but right now its all i'm interested in.

As far as multiplats, I hope it goes down like you said. But judging from this past generation platform jumping always resulted in a reduction in quality. Now the PC to XBOX jumps, I don't count those as a negative toward consoles, in my mind those were pluses, there is now way the XBOX is going to be able to compete technically against todays PCs, I mean its got a 64 megs and a celeron chip in it. Yet to achieve what they did with games like Splinter Cell, GR2, Doom3, Halo2, etc etc, are achievements in my mind. But i'm basically talking about the console to console multiplatforms, where developers chose to code to the weakest link or simply ignore the strengths of a system. Again, it would be a nice thing if you are right, but given how complex the programming is going to be, given how diverse the architecture between the consoles will be, and given the cost of developing in the next gen, I just don't see developer taking the time to maximize each product for each platform. I hope i'm wrong though.

slade
05-17-2005, 09:12 AM
Is this supposed to impress me. Basically all you have said is what we already know, and what i've just stated in my own thread. Let's reiterate, Eurogamer is lambasting Allard, Moore, and Bach, i've lambasted those guys too. Go read the XBOX forum, they are doing a horrible job marketing, and they've done a horrible job in the past with the XBOX. I wrote the XBOX succeeded despite MS marketing, and it looks like the XBOX 360 will have to succeed despite MS marketing.

Guess you missed that last paragraph. I don't blame you for seeing only what you want to see, you do it so well.

Mochan
05-17-2005, 09:23 AM
I'm also concerned about the points you raise. A year or so back when Bethsoft announced development on Oblivion, they said they were "developing for consoles and PCs concurrently" or something like that. I'm like, what the heck does that mean?! I still don't understand what it means, actually.

I see your point... if the game is not built ground-up for a particular system, then how can it make use of that particular system's capabilities to the fullest? An easier example to understand I guess would be PSP and DS. If you program a game to be released on both PSP and DS, then you'll be having a hell of a time making use of the DS's dual screen capabilities, or the PSP's technical superiority.

And I believe there were a few PC games that got screwed because they were being developed concurrently with the XBox, thus resulting in having to make compromises in order to accomodate for the XBox. Thief 3 I think was an example though don't quote me on that; some of the buffs at the PC boards no more about this.

Well, one thing you can at least be fall back on is that they don't have to be released at the same time on all consoles/systems. That would make the worst case scenario outlined above with the PSP/DS example true. But if they are made for one system first, then ported to another, then no compromises need be made, dev/publisher simply needs to work the game into the new hardware. Doom 3, Far Cry, etc. these follow this kind of model.

Anyway, good (or bad!) for me I still haven't gotten sick of modding. I'm still trying to sell of my current PC to someone so I can buy a new PC and start the modding cycle again!

theWacoKid
05-17-2005, 09:58 AM
Poor TMG, being an xbot, he doesn't understand how poor MS's showing has been, how cheezy their marketing is, how covered in 10W30 oil all their greasy mouthpieces are. MS treats gamers like they're mindless bozos buying a console for its hip factor. You can become part of the xbox 360. Express yourself a la Madonna.

I told people how weak MS first party has become with all their cuts, selling off studios, dumping respected developers midstream, that this wasn't how you prepare for next gen. All the stuff sony showed at E3, there's way more in development from their various interenal development teams.

PDZ, so embaressing was the reaction of those screenies and the brief video segments, MS pulled it as the star of the show. Palming off a nintendo kitty title, Kameo, intended for the gc, so mired in development problems that they MS moved this turkey to the 360 and are trying to palm off this turkey as a next gen game. That leaves PGR3. The only thing that can save MS arer third parties and Gears of War is a 2006 title. It won't be there for launch, so what big game is actually going to sell the 360 this xmas.

What does MS brag about and think is a MEGATON annoucement. FFXI on 360. An old ps2 reject that's also available on pc. Wow, MS is still chasing old ps2 leftovers and hand me downs. If that ain't sad, what is.

ThaMaskedGamer
05-17-2005, 10:13 AM
Poor TMG, being an xbot, he doesn't understand how poor MS's showing has been, how cheezy their marketing is, how covered in 10W30 oil all their greasy mouthpieces are. MS treats gamers like they're mindless bozos buying a console for its hip factor. You can become part of the xbox 360. Express yourself a la Madonna.

I told people how weak MS first party has become with all their cuts, selling off studios, dumping respected developers midstream, that this wasn't how you prepare for next gen. All the stuff sony showed at E3, there's way more in development from their various interenal development teams.

PDZ, so embaressing was the reaction of those screenies and the brief video segments, MS pulled it as the star of the show. Palming off a nintendo kitty title, Kameo, intended for the gc, so mired in development problems that they MS moved this turkey to the 360 and are trying to palm off this turkey as a next gen game. That leaves PGR3. The only thing that can save MS arer third parties and Gears of War is a 2006 title. It won't be there for launch, so what big game is actually going to sell the 360 this xmas.

What does MS brag about and think is a MEGATON annoucement. FFXI on 360. An old ps2 reject that's also available on pc. Wow, MS is still chasing old ps2 leftovers and hand me downs. If that ain't sad, what is.


H-O-L-Y Bejeezes MS is getting smoked at E-3. This deserves a completely new thread, all hail the PS3.

mandark
05-17-2005, 10:17 AM
That leaves PGR3. The only thing that can save MS arer third parties and Gears of War is a 2006 title. It won't be there for launch, so what big game is actually going to sell the 360 this xmas.

One title Waco. Halo 2.5! Megaton!!!

Gadfly2317
05-17-2005, 04:15 PM
Poor TMG, being an xbot, he doesn't understand how poor MS's showing has been, how cheezy their marketing is, how covered in 10W30 oil all their greasy mouthpieces are. MS treats gamers like they're mindless bozos buying a console for its hip factor. You can become part of the xbox 360. Express yourself a la Madonna.

I told people how weak MS first party has become with all their cuts, selling off studios, dumping respected developers midstream, that this wasn't how you prepare for next gen. All the stuff sony showed at E3, there's way more in development from their various interenal development teams.

PDZ, so embaressing was the reaction of those screenies and the brief video segments, MS pulled it as the star of the show. Palming off a nintendo kitty title, Kameo, intended for the gc, so mired in development problems that they MS moved this turkey to the 360 and are trying to palm off this turkey as a next gen game. That leaves PGR3. The only thing that can save MS arer third parties and Gears of War is a 2006 title. It won't be there for launch, so what big game is actually going to sell the 360 this xmas.

What does MS brag about and think is a MEGATON annoucement. FFXI on 360. An old ps2 reject that's also available on pc. Wow, MS is still chasing old ps2 leftovers and hand me downs. If that ain't sad, what is.


You just said it all. Thank you for saving my poor time-strapped ass from having to post about this debacle. Seriously. Thank you!

Jupiter_x
05-17-2005, 10:51 PM
Just grab a console, a 1080P HD set, and chill out and enjoy. Hell, with USB, i'm sure you'll be able to get some kind of kybd/mouse support too. I know for myself, i'm done with Windows PCs, my next PC will be a MAC.

Well I must agree with you here! 2 years ago I purchased a 3000+ Amd with 1024ram, Nforce, ATI 9700..nice system (HL2) but I doubt I will be upgrading or even replacing it any time soon, I usually do within 3 years or so. But now I don't really see anything mind blowing on the PC front...nothing? Plus it's getting too expensive....$849.00 for a freakin' vid card? Yeeeeaaaaahhh! :rolleyes:

Mochan
05-18-2005, 01:11 AM
The bigger name games on the PC aren't exclusive and will also be coming out on the consoles, so it's no surprise there's nothing to pique your interest, or at least haven't heard of any. But Stalker is easily *the* game that will get me upgrading this year. Oblivion would, too, but it's coming out on PS3 anyway so it shouldn't make any console gamers want to budge.

Stalker, though, is in many ways like Oblivion. It features a huge gameworld (about 20 square kilometers) with some very realistic looking graphics. The graphics look great, something like a cross between Far Cry's breadth and Doom's dark looks. The kicker is, the game has absolutely no load times! It's pure seamless action throughout that entire gameworld. I would exect just one load time at startup, once you're in the game there is supposed to be no load time.

The AI is also supposed to be incredible advanced, with monsters stalking you and taking care of their daily needs, and rival stalkers will be trying to accomplish the same objectives as you. They can succeed or get beaten out by you, or even eaten by the monsters in the area.

The game itself plays like a FPS Survival Horror hybrid, this game could easily be one of the first revolutionizing games of the next gen. Too bad it doesn't get much press, so it's no surprise a lot of people here haven't heard of it.

Fortunately for Jupter though, Stalker will probably be able to run fine on his rig if he should be so inclined, if not with all the bells and whistles.

Stalker will probably be coming out on nextgen consoles eventually, if it succeeds on the PC front. Or maybe there are already plans to port it to next gen consoles? This is unclear at the moment.

Jupiter_x
05-18-2005, 02:40 AM
Mochan, I will look into this "Stalker" game.I have heard of it!
As far as Oblivion is concerned, I hope the combat is not as wonky as it was in Morrowind, that was brutal, I got killed by "Cave Rats" at the very start of the game. Terrible game!

Mochan
05-18-2005, 03:28 AM
My beef with Morrowind's combat was how basic it was. Zelda Ocarina already had far better combat than that like 5 years prior! And it was too much about stats, you would miss even if your weapon passed right through the monster. It was basically just a matter of having high enough stats, and spamming the swing of your weapon in front of the monster til it (or you) dropped.

Oblivion apparently will incorporate a more action-oriented approach with blocking, dodging, timing, etc. If your weapon hits, it hits but damage will depend on your stats. Stuff like that. I'm quite excited to see how they do it.

And dang I hope Stalker comes out sometime this year for a change! It was supposed to have come out last year! At this rate, its graphics won't be next gen anymore by the time it comes out!

Someone asked Zilla Man to get info on it so hopefully he'll have some info for us within the next few days. I hope he also gets info on Namco X Capco. It's coming out next week or two but I just can't stop myself thinking about this game! I hope an English version comes out though, it's such a headache trying to play these games in Japanese.

ilnadmy
05-18-2005, 04:47 AM
And dang I hope Stalker comes out sometime this year for a change! It was supposed to have come out last year! At this rate, its graphics won't be next gen anymore by the time it comes out!

Someone asked Zilla Man to get info on it so hopefully he'll have some info for us within the next few days.

You're very welcome :D

Jupiter_x
05-24-2005, 06:28 PM
My beef with Morrowind's combat was how basic it was. Zelda Ocarina already had far better combat than that like 5 years prior! And it was too much about stats, you would miss even if your weapon passed right through the monster. It was basically just a matter of having high enough stats, and spamming the swing of your weapon in front of the monster til it (or you) dropped.

Oblivion apparently will incorporate a more action-oriented approach with blocking, dodging, timing, etc. If your weapon hits, it hits but damage will depend on your stats. Stuff like that. I'm quite excited to see how they do it.

And dang I hope Stalker comes out sometime this year for a change! It was supposed to have come out last year! At this rate, its graphics won't be next gen anymore by the time it comes out!

Someone asked Zilla Man to get info on it so hopefully he'll have some info for us within the next few days. I hope he also gets info on Namco X Capco. It's coming out next week or two but I just can't stop myself thinking about this game! I hope an English version comes out though, it's such a headache trying to play these games in Japanese.


Stalker, looks like a great game, I would love to get lost in this one!

moya
05-25-2005, 12:40 AM
Plus it's getting too expensive....$849.00 for a freakin' vid card? Yeeeeaaaaahhh! :rolleyes:

Hold on, what? I think you'll find you're mistaken. You could build your own system for that and have a pretty decent mid-high end rig as a result. $849 for a vid card? NOT ON MY WATCH! NO SIR>