PDA

View Full Version : N-vidia to supply graphics chip for PS3?


slade
08-28-2003, 08:32 PM
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) – It might have lost the fight for Xbox 2, but don't count nVidia out of the console business just yet.

ATI (ATYT: Research, Estimates) beat out nVidia earlier this month for the right to provide the graphics chip for Microsoft's (MSFT: Research, Estimates) next game machine. That followed ATI's March announcement that it had struck a technology development deal with Nintendo, presumably to supply the graphics technology for the successor to the GameCube.

The king of the console industry hasn't made any commitments yet, though. And while Sony (SNE: Research, Estimates) has preferred to own the technology components in past PlayStations, it might be mulling some changes this time around.

"The reality is nVidia is not sitting in a vacuum," said Erach Desai, an analyst with American Technology Research. "They are in discussions with Sony for the PS3."

Because of its age, the PlayStation 2 is the weakest graphically of the three consoles on the market. The machine is a year older than the Xbox or GameCube – and Sony froze the design specs long before the machine hit store shelves. The machine's current graphics chip was designed by Sony and manufactured by Fujitsu.

"They realize, I think, that they cannot do it all," said Desai. "I have checked with a couple of very seasoned executives ... and the strong impression is that there is interest from Sony and interest from nVidia."

Sony and nVidia (NVDA: Research, Estimates), for their part, aren't saying much about the whispers. Sony spokesperson Teresa Weaver said the company "hasn't made any announcements" regarding the PS3 - including a formal announcement that there would be a PS3.

nVidia was a little more forthcoming - but not much.

"We've always said we'd be happy to be in any game console," nVidia spokesperson Carrie Cowan told me recently. "We were pleased with the success of Xbox and feel nVidia helped elevate it to where it is today."

nVidia's experience in the console field certainly works in its advantage if it is in negotiations with Sony. The contentious relationship with Microsoft, though, could hurt it. The two companies bickered publicly for a long time about the price of nVidia's graphics chips. That dispute was ultimately settled via lengthy arbitration.

Still, the console business is important to nVidia. The company reported revenues of $460 million in the last fiscal quarter – and CEO Jen-Hsun Huang attributed much of the company's growth to increased shipments of Xbox components.

The graphics chip is the most expensive part of a gaming console, though, which is part of the reason Sony has traditionally kept development of that unit in-house. And price is certain to be in the forefront of the company's mind, since the speculated cost of the "Cell" microprocessor, which will power the PS3, is not going to be cheap.

Those cost concerns, combined with Sony's do-it-ourself history, that has some other analysts a bit more skeptical that nVidia will be able to win a PS3 contract.

"I would probably characterize it as a less than 50 percent chance that they win PS3," said Michael McConnell of Pacific Crest Securities. "However, we have talked with Sony and their take on it is they're considering an external vendor as well as an internal solution. So you can't rule it out, but you definitely can't say it's a sure thing."

Source is Money.cnn.com. Probably won't go through because Sony seems to have bigger plans for its Cell processor.

Whaxx
08-28-2003, 08:46 PM
Heh, All we need now is for Nintendo to use whatever company PS2 uses, in thier next console and we gots ourselves a cycle goin'!

Twelve
08-29-2003, 01:26 AM
Hmm. I'm hoping that nVidia doesn't get it, actually. Let Sony do it themselves, and they don't have to worry about possible squabbles in the future.

12

Renzatic Gear
08-29-2003, 09:11 AM
Dude! What will Folken buy now that his console of choice isn't a "unique piece of hardware"? he'll probably freak out and start playing pong..I'm taking bets if anyones interested.

trebor
08-29-2003, 09:42 AM
From what I've heard, if Sony does use nVidia for it's PS3, there is a very real possibility that the different architecture would NOT allow backwards compatibility. Which would be a crucial mistake on Sony's part.

Renzatic Gear
08-29-2003, 10:22 AM
If the PS3 has enough processing muscle behind it then it's possible that they could emulate the PS2 instead of making it truly backwards compatible. Either way you get the same results.

mass
08-29-2003, 12:53 PM
<div class=\"smallfont\">From what I've heard, if Sony does use nVidia for it's PS3, there is a very real possibility that the different architecture would NOT allow backwards compatibility. Which would be a crucial mistake on Sony's part.</div>

The only reason the ps2 is backwards compatable with ps1 software is sony sticks a psone chipset inside the ps2 complete with its own memory as well.

Whatever sony decides the architecture is bound to be so radically different from the ps2, sony will probably have only two options for backwards compatability. Include a ps2 chipset on board or emulation software.

mass
08-29-2003, 12:56 PM
Going with Nvidia for the graphics chipset is not a bad idea. The weakest part of the ps2 architecure is the gs with the 4meg vram bottleneck. That's the culprit behind a lot of the ps2's graphical problems.

The emotion engine is definitely preferable as a cpu to an ordinary garden variety cpu like the neutered p3 in the xbox.

Glockstar
08-29-2003, 02:57 PM
<div class=\"smallfont\">Source is Money.cnn.com. Probably won't go through because Sony seems to have bigger plans for its Cell processor.</div>

Yes, that's an interesting point.

But, this could mean that my sources were right all along - that Sony's having problems with their Cell chip.

Tappy_Tibbons
08-29-2003, 05:45 PM
well, either way. I don't see the cell as any more than hype right now. If it wasn't for Sony pushing the emotion engine like it was gonna be the best thing since sliced bread then it comes out doing less than the Dreamcast I've become quite wary as to trust Sony's hype.

Renzatic Gear
08-29-2003, 05:58 PM
I haven't read up much on the PS3 but isn't the cell chip the processor and not responsible for the graphics? If that's the case they might still need someone to do a GPU for em.

Fragmastar
08-29-2003, 08:53 PM
I really don't think nVidia should supply graphics chip for Sony. It's really a bad idea. It looks like Sony is laying low right now.

But it'll eventually stab nVidia's back and compromise with another, better graphics chip company. Hopefully, it'll do this before the year 2005 pushes through.

Glockstar
08-30-2003, 12:19 PM
<div class=\"smallfont\">I haven't read up much on the PS3 but isn't the cell chip the processor and not responsible for the graphics? If that's the case they might still need someone to do a GPU for em.</div>

No, you're quite right.

But I'm still partially right as well...

"While details remain vague, Cell will differ from existing microprocessors in that it will have multiple personalities. The chip will not only perform the heavy computational tasks required for graphics, but it also will contain the circuitry to handle high-bandwidth communications and to run multiple devices, sources say."And while there is this...

"IBM is expected to begin manufacturing Cell as soon as 2004 or possibly early 2005. But as with many other details about the chip, Jim Kahle [director of broadband processor technology and a research fellow at IBM] will confirm only that the Cell project is on track to meet it's a 2005 introduction, which was set forth at its initial announcement."

http://news.com.com/2100-1001-948493.html?tag=nl

... earlier there was...

"But Sony executives, while refusing to make any commitments for a PS2 successor, have indicated that the Cell processor expected to power the PlayStation 3 is taking longer to develop than expected."

http://news.com.com/2100-1043_3-1019181.html?tag=fd_top

Anyhow, I'm making my prediction right now... that Sony's PS3 will come out last.

Twelve
09-01-2003, 01:56 AM
I can see both wisdom and idiocy in the PS3 coming out last...it'll be interesting to see what happens.

12

"The Game"Evolution
09-01-2003, 08:04 AM
Thats the bottom line for me.All those great specs dont mean dick to me.Its all about two things for me:How much is it going to be and what will the PS3 do that the PS2 couldnt do? Those are the two big questions that Sony must answer before I would even consider wasting my time and money on this upcoming console.

Whaxx
09-01-2003, 09:53 AM
LOL,If Sony don't even know whos supplieng their graphics card by now, theres no way its coming out in 2005, and the pixel rate and other stuff on those specs, don't even beat Xbox's, I can one off the top of my head! Pixel Fillrate: 24 Billion Pixels per Second, Xboxs is 24 billion to 104 billion!!! HA! and those are even rumors, usually the actual specs are lower then the rumors.

slade
09-01-2003, 11:06 AM
NVIDIA link with PS3 rubbished by senior source

Rob Fahey 09:38 01/09/2003
"Lashing NVIDIA's technology onto the PS3 architecture would simply make no sense..."


A rumour linking graphics chipset manufacturer NVIDIA with the PlayStation 3 has been described as "ridiculous" by a senior source, who claims that the company will design its own GPU for the console.

The rumour was reported widely last week by a number of online news sites, based on a single article on CNN which quoted American Technology Research analyst Erach Desai as saying that NVIDIA "is in discussions with Sony for the PS3".

However, a senior source close to Sony Computer Entertainment told gi.biz that it was a "ridiculous suggestion" that Sony would look elsewhere for a designer and manufacturer for the graphics processor (GPU) for the future console. "Sony has its own chip design teams and manufacturing facilities with massive experience in this sort of thing," he commented. "Lashing NVIDIA's technology onto the PS3 architecture would simply make no sense either technologically or commercially."

Although NVIDIA is recognised as one of the market leaders in PC graphics technology, along with ATI, the company's chipsets are very different to the type of graphics unit required by the PS3 architecture, he claimed. This matches up with comments from other development sources who claim that the PS3 will feature a graphics chip not dissimilar to the Graphics Synthesizer in the PS2 - "effectively GS Mark Two", one told us - which Sony's internal teams are far better placed to create than NVIDIA's.

Sony is noted for taking a homegrown approach with the components in its console; the PS3 is expected to feature the Cell microprocessor, which Sony created in partnership with IBM and Toshiba, while the PS2 and PSP both feature custom graphics chipsets designed by Sony's labs. This approach allows the company to enjoy significant economies over the lifespan of a console, as its engineers can continue to work on integrating components into single chips or reducing the cost of the manufacturing process by other means.

NVIDIA's major rival in the PC space, ATI, recently won the contract to create the graphics chipset for the successor to Microsoft's Xbox - no surprise to those who have been following the internal tensions in the relationship between Microsoft and NVIDIA over the current Xbox contract, but rumours suggest that the final stumbling block may have been a refusal by NVIDIA to hand over manufacturing permissions for the chipset to Microsoft rather than creating and supplying all of the components itself. Given Sony's track record, it seems highly unlikely that it would accept anything less than this from a technology partner - so even ignoring the technology hurdles, a deal seems highly unlikely.

However, our source could not rule out the possibility of discussions between Sony and NVIDIA. "I'd expect that Sony talk to a lot of people," he commented. "In a business like that you always explore all the options, but it would take a hell of a pitch to change minds at Sony about internally developing the GPU, and NVIDIA just don't have that pitch. People hear a whisper that someone from NVIDIA is talking to someone from Sony and bang, you have a massive rumour, but it really doesn't mean anything - people from these companies talk all the time."

Thoughts? Personally, I'd prefer the homegrown approach.

slade
03-21-2005, 11:17 AM
Blast from the past.

Remember all this?

That stupid 'senior source' ended up being wrong.